Skip to main content

QA Review — MC #8793 / Target MC #8323

QA Review — MC #8793 / target MC #8323

Date: 2026-07-28 Reviewer: John / Proveo infrastructure specialist context (kelsey-hightower) BookStack: https://docs.alai.no/books/system-architecture/page/qa-review-mc-8793-target-mc-8323 Scope: Auto-generated QA review for completed MC #8323, “Azure-MIG T9: Start LightRAG + Neo4j on Azure VM”.

Verdict

PASS — historical evidence for MC #8323 exists and marks the task PASS, MC #8323 is done with DOD evidence recorded, and current LightRAG service health is OK through the supported wrapper endpoint.

Evidence checked

  1. node ~/system/tools/discover.js "QA review #8323 Azure-MIG T9 LightRAG Neo4j Azure VM evidence bulk-review-rag-tasks-20260423"

    • Found Proveo/QA tooling and BookStack/runbook context.
    • LightRAG direct unauthenticated discovery returned HTTP 401, so no claims are based on discovery RAG content.
  2. node ~/system/tools/mc.js show 8793

    • MC #8793 title: QA review: #8323.
    • Status before this report: in_progress.
    • Priority: L.
    • Description references ~/system/evidence/bulk-review-rag-tasks-20260423.md and PASS outcome.
  3. node ~/system/tools/mc.js show 8323

    • MC #8323 title: Azure-MIG T9: Start LightRAG + Neo4j on Azure VM.
    • Status: done.
    • Completed: 2026-04-23 08:19:12.
    • DOD evidence recorded in MC: both containers healthy in <60s, curl http://20.240.61.67:9621/health -> 200 in 69ms, Neo4j node count 21473, and llm_binding_host=https://ollama.basicconsulting.no confirmed in API response.
  4. Read /Users/makinja/system/evidence/bulk-review-rag-tasks-20260423.md

    • File exists: -rw-r--r-- 1 makinja staff 6505 Apr 23 17:59.
    • Row for #8323 states: PASS.
    • Evidence summary in that file: https://lightrag.basicconsulting.no/health returns HTTP 200 (via CF redirect). Raw IP 20.240.61.67:9621 timed out (firewall/CF proxied — expected). Cloud endpoint live.
    • Summary includes #8323 in the PASS/mark-done set.
  5. Current live checks from this Mac

    • curl -sS -m 12 http://20.240.61.67:9621/health timed out with http_code=000 after about 12.145s. This matches the older bulk-review note that raw IP may be firewalled/CF-proxied.
    • node ~/system/tools/lightrag.js status returned:
      • Health: OK
      • Endpoint: https://lightrag.alai.no
      • Mode: public_cf_access
      • Documents: 28027
      • Doc status counts: {"processed":27114,"processing":2,"pending":911}
    • curl -L -m 12 https://lightrag.basicconsulting.no/health timed out with http_code=000 after about 12.147s. This appears to be historical/stale relative to the current wrapper endpoint and is not used as the current health authority.

Findings

  • The required historical Proveo bulk review artifact exists on disk and explicitly records #8323 as PASS.
  • MC #8323 is recorded as done and contains DOD evidence for LightRAG, Neo4j non-empty restore, and LLM binding.
  • Current raw-IP and historical lightrag.basicconsulting.no browser/curl checks from this host do not respond within 12 seconds.
  • Current supported LightRAG wrapper health is OK at https://lightrag.alai.no with a non-empty document corpus.
  • I did not independently re-count Neo4j nodes in this review; the graph/labels probe in wrapper status reported HTTP 401 for that sub-probe. The Neo4j node count remains a historical DOD claim from MC #8323 plus the 2026-04-23 Proveo evidence trail.

QA decision

No rework required for auto-generated QA task #8793. Marking the review PASS is supported by the on-disk evidence file, MC #8323 DOD record, and current LightRAG wrapper health.


Source artifact: /Users/makinja/system/evidence/qa-review-8323-8793-20260728.md