QA Review — MC #8793 / Target MC #8323
QA Review — MC #8793 / target MC #8323
Date: 2026-07-28
Reviewer: John / Proveo infrastructure specialist context (kelsey-hightower)
BookStack: https://docs.alai.no/books/system-architecture/page/qa-review-mc-8793-target-mc-8323
Scope: Auto-generated QA review for completed MC #8323, “Azure-MIG T9: Start LightRAG + Neo4j on Azure VM”.
Verdict
PASS — historical evidence for MC #8323 exists and marks the task PASS, MC #8323 is done with DOD evidence recorded, and current LightRAG service health is OK through the supported wrapper endpoint.
Evidence checked
-
node ~/system/tools/discover.js "QA review #8323 Azure-MIG T9 LightRAG Neo4j Azure VM evidence bulk-review-rag-tasks-20260423"- Found Proveo/QA tooling and BookStack/runbook context.
- LightRAG direct unauthenticated discovery returned HTTP 401, so no claims are based on discovery RAG content.
-
node ~/system/tools/mc.js show 8793- MC #8793 title:
QA review: #8323. - Status before this report:
in_progress. - Priority:
L. - Description references
~/system/evidence/bulk-review-rag-tasks-20260423.mdand PASS outcome.
- MC #8793 title:
-
node ~/system/tools/mc.js show 8323- MC #8323 title:
Azure-MIG T9: Start LightRAG + Neo4j on Azure VM. - Status:
done. - Completed:
2026-04-23 08:19:12. - DOD evidence recorded in MC: both containers healthy in <60s,
curl http://20.240.61.67:9621/health -> 200 in 69ms, Neo4j node count21473, andllm_binding_host=https://ollama.basicconsulting.noconfirmed in API response.
- MC #8323 title:
-
Read
/Users/makinja/system/evidence/bulk-review-rag-tasks-20260423.md- File exists:
-rw-r--r-- 1 makinja staff 6505 Apr 23 17:59. - Row for #8323 states:
PASS. - Evidence summary in that file:
https://lightrag.basicconsulting.no/health returns HTTP 200 (via CF redirect). Raw IP 20.240.61.67:9621 timed out (firewall/CF proxied — expected). Cloud endpoint live. - Summary includes #8323 in the PASS/mark-done set.
- File exists:
-
Current live checks from this Mac
curl -sS -m 12 http://20.240.61.67:9621/healthtimed out withhttp_code=000after about 12.145s. This matches the older bulk-review note that raw IP may be firewalled/CF-proxied.node ~/system/tools/lightrag.js statusreturned:Health: OKEndpoint: https://lightrag.alai.noMode: public_cf_accessDocuments: 28027- Doc status counts:
{"processed":27114,"processing":2,"pending":911}
curl -L -m 12 https://lightrag.basicconsulting.no/healthtimed out withhttp_code=000after about 12.147s. This appears to be historical/stale relative to the current wrapper endpoint and is not used as the current health authority.
Findings
- The required historical Proveo bulk review artifact exists on disk and explicitly records #8323 as PASS.
- MC #8323 is recorded as done and contains DOD evidence for LightRAG, Neo4j non-empty restore, and LLM binding.
- Current raw-IP and historical
lightrag.basicconsulting.nobrowser/curl checks from this host do not respond within 12 seconds. - Current supported LightRAG wrapper health is OK at
https://lightrag.alai.nowith a non-empty document corpus. - I did not independently re-count Neo4j nodes in this review; the graph/labels probe in wrapper status reported HTTP 401 for that sub-probe. The Neo4j node count remains a historical DOD claim from MC #8323 plus the 2026-04-23 Proveo evidence trail.
QA decision
No rework required for auto-generated QA task #8793. Marking the review PASS is supported by the on-disk evidence file, MC #8323 DOD record, and current LightRAG wrapper health.
Source artifact: /Users/makinja/system/evidence/qa-review-8323-8793-20260728.md
No comments to display
No comments to display