ALAI Client Incident Response — Runbook
ALAI Client Incident Response — Runbook
Version: 1.0 Created: 2026-07-28 Owner: John (AI Director) / Alem Basic (CEO) Source process: processes/incident-management.md (full spec), processes/quick-ref/incident-response-quickref.md Related: processes/templates/incident-report.md, processes/communication-protocol.md
1. Purpose
Client-facing runbook for handling any incident that affects a client's service: production outages, bugs, security incidents, SLA breaches. This is the condensed operational version — the full governance document (classification rationale, GDPR appendix, KPIs, audit trail) lives in processes/incident-management.md.
2. Severity Matrix
| Severity | Definition | Response Time | Resolution Target | Notify |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 CRITICAL | Service completely down, active data breach, revenue impact, legal/regulatory violation | 15 min | 4 hours | Alem + Client + Datatilsynet (if GDPR) |
| P2 HIGH | Major feature broken, client blocked, no workaround, security vulnerability | 1 hour | 8 hours | John + Tech Lead + Client |
| P3 MEDIUM | Minor feature broken, workaround exists | 4 hours | 24 hours | John + relevant agent |
| P4 LOW | Cosmetic, no business impact | 24 hours | 5 days | Assigned agent |
When in doubt, escalate up. Better to downgrade a P1 to P2 than to underestimate a critical incident.
3. Response Flow
Detection -> Triage & Classify -> Investigation -> Resolution -> Verification -> Communication -> Post-Mortem -> Closure
Step 1 — Detection
| Source | Action |
|---|---|
| Automated monitoring (Mission Control, health checks) | Auto-alert to John |
| Client report (email, ticket) | Logged via support-ticket.js, escalated by John |
| Internal discovery (agent/dev) | Report to John immediately (Mattermost #ai-ops) |
| Third-party/vendor | Forward to John + Alem |
Step 2 — Triage & Classify (John, within SLA response time above)
- Acknowledge receipt to the reporter
- Classify severity using the matrix in Section 2
- Assign owner (agent/role per incident type)
- Create incident record:
comms/incidents/INC-YYYY-MM-DD-NNN.mdfromprocesses/templates/incident-report.md - Notify stakeholders per Escalation Matrix (Section 4)
- Open Mattermost thread in
#incidents
Step 3 — Investigation
- Reproduce the issue in the affected environment
- Gather evidence: logs, metrics, screenshots
- Root cause analysis (5 Whys / Fishbone / Timeline) — mandatory for P1/P2
- Assess impact: users, data, services affected
- Fix plan: immediate mitigation vs. long-term fix
Step 4 — Resolution
- Implement fix (code, config, infra, or process change)
- Validate: staging for P2-P4, production hotfix + 1h monitoring for P1
- Deploy per deployment protocol
- Monitor metrics/logs/error rates for 1 hour post-deploy
Step 5 — Verification
- Fix deployed to production
- Smoke tests passing
- No related errors in the last hour
- Monitoring shows normal metrics
- Client confirms resolution (if client-reported)
- Incident record updated to "Resolved"
Step 6 — Communication cadence
| Severity | Initial Update | Progress Updates | Resolution Notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Within 15 min | Every 30 min | Immediately + 24h follow-up |
| P2 | Within 1 hour | Every 2 hours | Within 1h of resolution |
| P3 | Within 4 hours | Daily if >24h | Next business day OK |
| P4 | N/A unless client-reported | N/A | Next sprint review |
Step 7 — Post-Mortem (mandatory P1/P2, optional P3)
- Scheduled within 2 business days of resolution, conducted within 5
- Blameless, fact-based, action-oriented
- Every post-mortem produces at least one action item, tracked in Mission Control
- Template and full 10-section structure: see
processes/incident-management.md§7.3
Step 8 — Closure
- Incident resolved and verified
- Post-mortem completed (P1/P2)
- Action items created and assigned
- Documentation/runbooks updated
- Client notified (final resolution email)
- Incident record archived to
comms/incidents/archive/YYYY/
4. Escalation Matrix
P4: Developer -> Tech Lead (review) -> Archive
P3: Developer -> Tech Lead (notified) -> Archive
P2: Tech Lead (owns) -> John (notified) -> Client notified -> Archive
-> if SLA breach: Alem involved
P1: John coordinates -> Alem notified IMMEDIATELY -> Client notified IMMEDIATELY
-> Datatilsynet if GDPR breach (72h)
Escalate to Alem when: any P1; P2 affecting a major client or revenue; client relationship risk; legal/regulatory implication (GDPR, lawsuit threat); media/PR risk; financial impact >50,000 NOK; requires external assistance.
| Authority | When | Deadline | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Datatilsynet | Personal data breach (GDPR Art. 33) | 72h from detection | [email protected] |
| Client | Breach of data processing agreement | 24h per DPA | Client contact per contract |
| Politiet (Kripos) | Criminal activity | Immediately | 02800, [email protected] |
| NSM | Critical infrastructure attack | Immediately | [email protected] |
5. Client Communication Templates
Initial notification (email, within SLA)
Subject: [Action Required / Informational] Service Incident Notification — [Client Name]
We are writing to inform you of a service incident affecting [affected service/feature].
Incident Summary:
- What: [impact — what users experience]
- When Detected: [date, time]
- Current Status: [Investigating / Mitigating / Resolved]
- Impact to Your Users: [specific — e.g. "Login unavailable"]
What We Are Doing: [response actions underway]
Next Steps: [what client should expect, workaround if any, next update time]
Estimated Resolution: [if known, or "Investigating"]
We will provide updates every [timeframe] until resolved.
Resolution confirmation
Subject: RESOLVED: Service Incident — [Client Name]
Incident Summary:
- Issue: [what happened]
- Root Cause: [brief, non-technical]
- Resolution: [what was fixed]
- Resolved At / Total Duration: [...]
Preventive Actions: [what we are doing to prevent recurrence]
Impact to Your Data: [confirm no data loss, or describe]
Full template set (internal declared/update/resolved, GDPR Art. 33/34 regulatory notices): processes/incident-management.md §6.
6. On-Call
- Primary: John (AI Director) — 24/7 via automated monitoring
- Human backup: Alem (CEO) — for P1 decisions requiring a human
- Business hours: Mon-Fri 08:00-18:00 CET; after-hours P1 = John responds immediately + alerts Alem by phone, P2 = John within 1h + email to Alem (reviewed within 4h)
- Contact priority: Mattermost #ai-ops -> email [email protected] -> phone (P1 only)
7. Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Command |
|---|---|---|
| support-ticket.js | Create incident record from client report | node ~/system/tools/support-ticket.js create --title "[Title]" --severity [P1-P4] |
| Mission Control | Track incident as task | node ~/system/tools/mc.js add "[INC-ID] [Title]" --priority high |
| Mattermost | Real-time incident channel | node ~/system/tools/mm.js send basic incidents "[Update]" |
| HiveMind | Log lessons learned | node ~/system/agents/hivemind/hivemind.js post john incident "[Lesson]" |
| health-check.js | System health monitoring | node ~/system/tools/health-check.js --quick |
| auto-fix.js | Automated recovery for known issues | node ~/system/tools/auto-fix.js <service> <issue> |
Mission Control Dashboard: http://localhost:3030
8. Hard Rules
- Blameless post-mortems — focus on systems/process, never individuals.
- Every P1/P2 gets a post-mortem within 5 business days, no exceptions.
- GDPR 72h clock starts at detection, not at confirmation — when in doubt, start the clock.
- Client communication is never skipped for P1/P2, even if resolution is fast.
- No incident closes without an incident record in
comms/incidents/.
9. Related Documents
- processes/incident-management.md — full 13-section governance document (severity rationale, KPIs, RCA appendix, GDPR breach assessment tree, quarterly review process)
- processes/quick-ref/incident-response-quickref.md — 1-page field version
- processes/templates/incident-report.md
- ALAI-CLIENT-ONBOARDING.md
- ALAI-CLIENT-INVOICE-CYCLE.md
Document Location: ~/ALAI/processes/runbooks/ALAI-CLIENT-INCIDENT-RESPONSE.md
Access Control: INTERNAL