Test Plan
Test Plan
Project: {{PROJECT_NAME}} Version: {{VERSION}} Date: {{DATE}} Author: {{AUTHOR}} Status: Draft | In Review | Approved Reviewers: {{REVIEWERS}}
Document History
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | {{DATE}} | {{AUTHOR}} | Initial draft |
1. Test Objectives
This test plan covers testing for {{RELEASE_NAME}} ({{VERSION}}) of {{PROJECT_NAME}}.
Primary objectives:
- Verify that {{OBJECTIVE_1}}
- Verify that {{OBJECTIVE_2}}
- Confirm no regression in {{REGRESSION_AREA}}
- Validate performance under expected production load
Out of scope for this plan: See Section 3 (Scope).
2. Features Under Test
| Feature / Story | Priority | Test Types | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| {{FEATURE_1}} | Critical | Unit, Integration, E2E | {{OWNER}} |
| {{FEATURE_2}} | High | Unit, Integration | {{OWNER}} |
| {{FEATURE_3}} | Medium | Unit | {{OWNER}} |
| Regression — {{AREA}} | High | E2E, Manual | {{OWNER}} |
3. Scope
In Scope
- {{IN_SCOPE_1}}
- {{IN_SCOPE_2}}
- Regression testing of {{REGRESSION_MODULES}}
- Performance testing of {{PERF_SCOPE}} endpoints
- Security testing of new authentication changes
Out of Scope
| Item | Justification |
|---|---|
| {{OUT_1}} | {{REASON_1}} |
| {{OUT_2}} | {{REASON_2}} |
| Third-party integrations ({{SERVICE}}) | Tested in integration test suite; provider responsible for own reliability |
4. Test Schedule & Milestones
| Milestone | Date | Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| Test plan approved | {{DATE}} | QA Lead |
| Test environment ready | {{DATE}} | Platform team |
| Test data seeded | {{DATE}} | QA team |
| Unit + integration tests complete | {{DATE}} | Dev team |
| E2E test authoring complete | {{DATE}} | QA team |
| Regression testing complete | {{DATE}} | QA team |
| UAT start | {{DATE}} | QA + Product |
| UAT sign-off | {{DATE}} | Product Owner |
| Performance testing complete | {{DATE}} | DevOps + QA |
| Go/no-go decision | {{DATE}} | Eng manager |
| Production release | {{DATE}} | Release manager |
5. Resource Allocation
| Resource | Role | Testing Activities | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|
| {{PERSON_1}} | QA Lead | E2E authoring, regression | 100% |
| {{PERSON_2}} | Developer | Unit + integration tests | 30% of sprint |
| {{PERSON_3}} | Developer | Unit + integration tests | 30% of sprint |
| {{PERSON_4}} | DevOps | Performance, infrastructure | 20% |
| {{PERSON_5}} | Product Owner | UAT review and sign-off | As needed |
6. Entry Criteria
Testing may begin when:
- Feature development is code-complete (all tickets in "Ready for QA")
- Unit tests passing (≥ {{UNIT_PASS_RATE}}% pass rate)
- Integration tests passing
- Build artifact deployed to test environment
- Test environment is stable (health checks passing)
- Test data is seeded and verified
- Test cases for new features reviewed and approved
- Previous known blocking bugs resolved (see bug tracker)
7. Exit Criteria
Testing is complete when:
- All test cases executed
- ≥ {{PASS_RATE}}% of test cases pass
- All Critical and High defects resolved or accepted with justification
- Medium defects reviewed — plan in place for outstanding items
- Code coverage ≥ {{COVERAGE_GATE}}%
- E2E tests passing on staging
- Performance tests meeting SLA targets
- UAT sign-off obtained from Product Owner
- Go/no-go checklist complete (see Section 14)
- Release notes updated with test summary
Exceptional circumstances: If exit criteria cannot be met, a documented risk acceptance from {{ACCEPTANCE_AUTHORITY}} is required.
8. Test Strategy Summary Per Type
| Type | Approach | Tool | Owner | Gate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit | White-box, TDD where applicable | {{UNIT_TOOL}} | Developers | Blocks merge |
| Integration | Real dependencies via TestContainers | {{INT_TOOL}} | Developers | Blocks merge |
| E2E | Critical user journeys, automated | {{E2E_TOOL}} | QA | Blocks release |
| Regression | Automated suite + targeted manual | {{E2E_TOOL}} + manual | QA | Blocks release |
| Performance | Load test at {{LOAD_PROFILE}} | {{PERF_TOOL}} | DevOps | Blocks release |
| Security | SAST + SCA + manual review | {{SAST_TOOL}} | DevOps | Blocks merge |
| UAT | Business scenario validation | Manual | Product Owner | Blocks release |
| Accessibility | Automated + manual audit | {{A11Y_TOOL}} | Developer + QA | Warning |
9. Test Environment Requirements
| Environment | Purpose | URL | Access Needed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dev | Unit/integration | dev.{{DOMAIN}} |
All team members |
| Staging | E2E, regression, UAT | staging.{{DOMAIN}} |
Team + PM + stakeholders |
| Performance | Load testing | Isolated (production-sized) | DevOps + QA |
Environment requirements:
- Staging must have production-equivalent configuration
- Test database seeded with {{DATA_VOLUME}} records
- Third-party integrations in sandbox/test mode
- Monitoring enabled (same as production)
10. Test Data Requirements
| Data Category | Volume | Creation Method | Responsible |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test user accounts | {{USER_COUNT}} | scripts/seed-users.sh |
QA team |
| {{DATA_TYPE_1}} | {{VOLUME}} | Factory / fixtures | QA team |
| {{DATA_TYPE_2}} | {{VOLUME}} | Anonymized from production | DevOps |
| Edge case data (empty states, max values) | Defined per test | Manual / fixtures | QA team |
Data cleanup: All test data removed after test run via scripts/cleanup.sh
11. Risk-Based Test Prioritization
| Risk Area | Likelihood | Impact | Priority | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payment processing failure | Medium | Critical | P1 | Full regression + manual testing |
| Data migration errors | High | Critical | P1 | Staged migration + rollback plan |
| Performance degradation | Medium | High | P2 | Load test at 2x expected peak |
| Third-party API downtime | Low | Medium | P3 | Stub in tests, circuit breaker in code |
| Authentication edge cases | Low | Critical | P1 | Full auth test suite |
12. Dependencies & Assumptions
Dependencies:
- Platform team provisions staging environment by {{DATE}}
- {{THIRD_PARTY}} sandbox environment available
- Security team approves SAST configuration by {{DATE}}
Assumptions:
- Feature requirements will not change during the testing phase
- All developers will respond to bugs within {{BUG_RESPONSE_SLA}} hours
- UAT participants are available per the schedule in Section 4
13. Defect Management Process
Bug tracker: {{BUG_TRACKER}} Severity levels:
| Severity | Definition | Resolution SLA |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | System unusable, data loss, security issue | Fix before release |
| High | Major feature broken, no workaround | Fix before release |
| Medium | Feature degraded, workaround exists | Fix in next sprint |
| Low | Minor issue, cosmetic | Backlog |
Bug lifecycle: Open → Assigned → In Progress → Fixed → Verified → Closed Triage cadence: Daily during active testing phase
14. Test Deliverables
| Deliverable | Format | Due Date | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test plan (this document) | Markdown | {{DATE}} | QA Lead |
| Test cases | {{BUG_TRACKER}} / Markdown | {{DATE}} | QA team |
| Test execution results | Automated CI reports + summary | {{DATE}} | QA team |
| Defect report | {{BUG_TRACKER}} | Ongoing | QA team |
| Performance test report | Markdown + charts | {{DATE}} | DevOps |
| UAT sign-off | Signed uat-signoff.md | {{DATE}} | Product Owner |
| Test summary report | Markdown | {{DATE}} | QA Lead |
Related Documents
- Test Strategy
- Test Case Template
- E2E Test Plan
- Performance Test Plan
- Definition of Done
- UAT Sign-off
Approval
| Role | Name | Date | Signature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | |||
| Reviewer | |||
| Approver |