Initial Package QA Review Source: ~/ALAI/products/Plock/docs/demo-readiness/05-initial-package-review.md PLOCK — Initial Package QA Review Date: 2026-03-14 Reviewer: John Scope: Manual QA review of the current canonical PLOCK demo-readiness baseline package under ~/ALAI/products/Plock/docs/demo-readiness/ . 1. Package Verdict Document Quality Verdict: PASS WITH NOTES Downstream Usage Verdict: GO for narrow documentation-truth work; NO-GO for broad implementation fan-out until remaining P0/P1 issues are addressed. Why The package now exists on disk, is indexed, and provides a coherent baseline for source-of-truth, user stories, features, gaps, and QA review. However, it still carries important caveats: docs/ARCHITECTURE.md remains stale/conflicting in the repo docs/API-SPEC.md still requires explicit verification against code infrastructure/README.md still needs security-hygiene cleanup the fuller demo-readiness package is not complete yet 2. Artifact Check Reviewed files INDEX.md 00-canonical-source-of-truth.md 01-user-stories-baseline.md 02-feature-baseline.md 03-gaps-and-next-steps.md 04-qa-checklist-baseline.md Result All reviewed files exist on disk All are readable All are located under the expected canonical path docs/demo-readiness/INDEX.md links the core package correctly docs/INDEX.md points to the canonical package Artifact verdict: PASS 3. Per-Document Review Records QA Review Record Document: Canonical baseline index Path: ~/ALAI/products/Plock/docs/demo-readiness/INDEX.md Reviewer: John Date: 2026-03-14 Verdict: PASS Artifact Check Exists: yes Correct path: yes Correct filename: yes Indexed: n/a (entry point document) Evidence Check Primary sources used: package structure itself Any unsupported claims: none material Contradiction Check Conflicts found: none Stale-doc contamination found: no Traceability Check User-story traceability: n/a Feature traceability: n/a Security Hygiene Check Secret-like material copied: no Security posture accurately described: yes Notes / Remediation None QA Review Record Document: Canonical source of truth Path: ~/ALAI/products/Plock/docs/demo-readiness/00-canonical-source-of-truth.md Reviewer: John Date: 2026-03-14 Verdict: PASS WITH NOTES Artifact Check Exists: yes Correct path: yes Correct filename: yes Indexed: yes Evidence Check Primary sources used: repo structure, build docs, runbooks, RLS/security docs, PRD/GTM/REGULATORY docs Any unsupported claims: no major unsupported claims after path correction and gap refresh Contradiction Check Conflicts found: corrected ADR path references from docs/adr/* to adr/* ; refreshed outdated “missing package” statements Stale-doc contamination found: no; stale architecture doc is explicitly quarantined Traceability Check User-story traceability: indirect but adequate Feature traceability: indirect but adequate Security Hygiene Check Secret-like material copied: no Security posture accurately described: yes Notes / Remediation Continue using this as the authority map, but refresh remaining-gap section when new canonical docs are added. QA Review Record Document: User stories baseline Path: ~/ALAI/products/Plock/docs/demo-readiness/01-user-stories-baseline.md Reviewer: John Date: 2026-03-14 Verdict: PASS WITH NOTES Artifact Check Exists: yes Correct path: yes Correct filename: yes Indexed: yes Evidence Check Primary sources used: docs/PRD.md , backend route/service structure, integrations, runbook/regulatory context Any unsupported claims: some maturity labels remain approximate and should be revalidated during runtime/demo verification Contradiction Check Conflicts found: no major architecture contradictions found Stale-doc contamination found: no Traceability Check User-story traceability: yes Feature traceability: mostly yes; evidence is sufficient for a baseline but not yet exhaustive at section-by-section code depth Security Hygiene Check Secret-like material copied: no Security posture accurately described: yes Notes / Remediation Good canonical baseline. Later passes should tighten evidence granularity and confirm AI/mobile maturity against runtime behavior, not just repo structure. QA Review Record Document: Feature baseline Path: ~/ALAI/products/Plock/docs/demo-readiness/02-feature-baseline.md Reviewer: John Date: 2026-03-14 Verdict: PASS WITH NOTES Artifact Check Exists: yes Correct path: yes Correct filename: yes Indexed: yes Evidence Check Primary sources used: routes, services, migrations, frontend MFE structure, test folders, ops/security docs Any unsupported claims: a few maturity judgments remain intentionally approximate ( partial , planned-to-partial ) and should be revisited during deeper verification Contradiction Check Conflicts found: none material Stale-doc contamination found: no Traceability Check User-story traceability: strong enough for baseline planning Feature traceability: yes, with direct module/file references for most sections Security Hygiene Check Secret-like material copied: no Security posture accurately described: yes Notes / Remediation Strong baseline. Future revisions should verify ops/monitoring and AI claims against live behavior before demo commitments. QA Review Record Document: Gaps and next steps Path: ~/ALAI/products/Plock/docs/demo-readiness/03-gaps-and-next-steps.md Reviewer: John Date: 2026-03-14 Verdict: PASS WITH NOTES Artifact Check Exists: yes Correct path: yes Correct filename: yes Indexed: yes Evidence Check Primary sources used: package state, repo findings, orchestration incident findings, doc drift findings Any unsupported claims: none material after current-state refresh Contradiction Check Conflicts found: refreshed outdated statements that previously said the package and QA checklist did not exist Stale-doc contamination found: no Traceability Check User-story traceability: indirect but acceptable Feature traceability: indirect but acceptable Security Hygiene Check Secret-like material copied: no Security posture accurately described: yes Notes / Remediation Keep this document current as additional canonical docs are created; it is time-sensitive by nature. QA Review Record Document: QA checklist baseline Path: ~/ALAI/products/Plock/docs/demo-readiness/04-qa-checklist-baseline.md Reviewer: John Date: 2026-03-14 Verdict: PASS Artifact Check Exists: yes Correct path: yes Correct filename: yes Indexed: yes Evidence Check Primary sources used: actual failure patterns observed in orchestration and documentation work Any unsupported claims: none material Contradiction Check Conflicts found: none Stale-doc contamination found: no Traceability Check User-story traceability: n/a Feature traceability: n/a Security Hygiene Check Secret-like material copied: no Security posture accurately described: yes Notes / Remediation This should be applied to all future additions to the package. 4. Package-Level Notes What is now good enough canonical source-of-truth layer exists user stories and feature baseline exist gaps/next-steps are documented deterministic QA criteria now exist package is discoverable via both filesystem and HiveMind What still blocks a broad implementation wave stale docs/ARCHITECTURE.md still exists in the repo and can mislead future agents docs/API-SPEC.md still needs verification against code infra security-hygiene issue still needs cleanup fuller demo-readiness docs remain incomplete 5. Final Go / No-Go GO narrow documentation-truth work narrow source-referenced QA work controlled backlog preparation based on these canonical docs explicit review of stale/conflicting docs NO-GO broad parallel implementation wave based on legacy docs claims of demo-ready or prod-ready status without further verification trusting docs/ARCHITECTURE.md as current truth trusting docs/API-SPEC.md as canonical without code verification 6. Decision The current PLOCK canonical baseline package passes manual review as a usable planning foundation, but only with explicit caveats. It is good enough to guide the next narrow, deterministic documentation and QA steps. It is not yet a license for broad implementation fan-out or readiness claims.